At first glance, it may seem contradictory for someone who behaves or argues illogically to advocate for the importance of logic. Yet this phenomenon is surprisingly common. The tension between belief and behavior, or between self-image and actual reasoning skills, can explain why a person who often makes irrational decisions or demonstrates flawed thinking might still be a vocal supporter of logical thinking.

Desire for Identity

People often promote qualities they wish to possess or be associated with. Championing logic can serve as a self-statement: “I value reason, I am rational.” Even if their actions betray logical inconsistency, their verbal alignment with logic becomes part of how they want to be perceived. This identity signal is particularly strong in intellectual environments or online discussions, where being seen as rational earns social credibility.

Compensating for Insecurity

When someone feels unsure of their own reasoning skills, they may overcompensate by clinging to the idea of logic as a stabilizing force. The more they struggle to think clearly or avoid emotional bias, the more attractive logic appears as a solution to their inner chaos. Ironically, they may begin preaching about logic not from a place of mastery, but from a deep yearning to find order in a confusing world.

Misunderstanding What Logic Is

Some individuals use the word “logic” loosely, equating it with personal opinions, emotional gut reactions, or convenient explanations. They may believe they are being logical simply because they are being decisive or firm. In this sense, promoting logic becomes a label for their worldview rather than an actual practice of formal reasoning. This misunderstanding allows them to feel consistent even while acting irrationally.

The Mirror Effect

An illogical person may see the chaos in their own thinking reflected in others. When they feel frustrated with the irrationality of people around them, it magnifies their internal struggle. They might become vocal about the need for logic in society without recognizing that their own behavior contributes to the same problem. The call for logic, then, is less about solving others and more about subconsciously trying to fix themselves.

Performative Intelligence

In some circles, advocating for logic is a form of intellectual performance. It signals intelligence, authority, and control. By frequently referencing logic, even those who do not consistently apply it can elevate their perceived competence. They may even quote logical principles or use structured language as a kind of armor to defend weak or emotional arguments.

Conclusion

To champion logic while living or thinking illogically is not hypocrisy in the traditional sense. It is often a complex mix of aspiration, misunderstanding, self-deception, and the human tendency to say one thing while doing another. Recognizing this can encourage more compassion in discourse and more self-awareness in those who genuinely want to grow. Logic is a discipline, not an identity, and it requires consistent practice—not just praise—to be real.