EFTA00025010 is a document label used for a DOJ-hosted PDF that reproduces an FBI Intake record connected to an Epstein-related case file. It is a tip-intake entry, meaning it captures what a complainant submitted and how the FBI’s intake system logged it at the time it was received. It is not an investigative report, not a court filing, and not proof that any allegation inside it is true.
What makes this intake notable is that it contains a detailed narrative in which the complainant alleges child sex trafficking involving Jeffrey Epstein, provides an alleged timeframe and location, and describes extreme additional claims and named individuals as part of the submission.
What this document is
An FBI intake record is essentially a structured “front door” record: it’s designed to log, categorize, and route information. The intake format typically includes:
- A case label and case ID used to group the tip
- A received date and time
- Structured fields that categorize the alleged offense
- Narrative text written by the submitter
- “Subject” and other named-entity fields (as entered in the intake)
- Technical submission metadata (system and browser details)
This is important because intake records often contain raw claims, including mistaken or unverified information. Their primary function is traceability and routing, not certification.
The basic identifiers in the record
The document header includes several key details:
- Case label: “(U) EPSTEIN, JEFFREY; CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING”
- Case ID: 50D-NY-3027571
- Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
- Date and time received: August 3, 2020 at 6:01 PM EDT
The intake also shows a “submitted” time earlier the same day, consistent with an online tip being sent and then processed into an intake entry.
How the tip is described as being submitted
The intake indicates the information was handled by the FBI’s National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) and is framed as a follow-up tip. It also includes a transaction number that functions like an internal receipt for the submission.
The record contains a field labeled “Threat To Life” marked False, which is a standardized intake field that indicates the submission was not flagged in the intake system as an immediate, active life-threatening emergency requiring urgent intervention.
What the complainant alleges about Jeffrey Epstein
The largest portion of the record is the complainant’s narrative. In plain terms, the intake logs the complainant stating that:
- They previously submitted a tip using an alias and are now submitting again with their real name.
- They say they had a phone conversation with a person described as connected to an NYPD and FBI sex trafficking task force.
- They allege they were trafficked by their uncle and Jeffrey Epstein when they were 13 years old and pregnant.
- They claim they gave “important information” about “other high profile individuals.”
- They make an extreme allegation involving the death of their newborn child and describe a disposal method.
- The purpose of the follow-up, according to the complainant’s text, is to re-establish contact with the investigator who allegedly called them because they cannot remember his name and do not have a number to call back, and they want to know whether further follow-up will occur.
The intake records these statements as the complainant’s claims. It does not include attachments, corroboration, or an outcome.
The “Violation Questions” section: how the FBI intake categorized the claim
The intake contains structured questions and answers that summarize the allegation in a standardized way. It includes fields that record:
- Violation category: listed as “Other”
- A field where the complainant’s described crime is captured as “child sex trafficking and infanticide”
- Approximate timeframe: “May–Sep 1984”
- Location description: “Mostly from a yacht in Lake Michigan originating from Mona Lake, MI”
This section is important because it distills the narrative into searchable, routable data. It also shows how the complainant framed the time and place.
The “Subject Information” section: how Epstein is logged
The intake includes a “Subject Information” block that lists Jeffrey Epstein by name. This is the core anchor for why the tip is filed under an Epstein-related case label.
In addition to the subject listing, the intake contains narrative text describing how the complainant claims Epstein was involved. In general terms, it describes a scenario where the complainant alleges they were brought into a setting involving boats or yachts, that men were present, that money was exchanged, and that sexual acts were coerced while the complainant was a minor and pregnant.
Again, those statements are recorded as allegations, not confirmed findings.
The “Witness Information” section and why people fixate on it
A major point of attention in this intake is that it includes a “Witness Information” entry that names Donald Trump.
Under that entry, the record includes additional narrative text that repeats and expands on the complainant’s claims and makes severe allegations about the named individual’s involvement, including being present for the alleged death and disposal of the newborn child and involvement in coerced sexual exploitation.
Two things should be kept separate when interpreting this:
- The intake shows that the tip was logged with that name appearing in a witness-related field.
- The appearance of a name in an intake field is not proof of role, involvement, truthfulness, or verification. It reflects what the submitter stated and how the intake form recorded it.
Intake forms often force messy human narratives into a limited set of boxes and labels. A field label like “witness” does not guarantee the named person is actually a witness in the ordinary legal sense.
Technical submission metadata included in the intake
The intake contains technical details typical of online submission logging, such as:
- A remote host reference
- A referrer string indicating a tip-submission flow
- A browser user-agent line
- IP-derived location indicators (such as city/region values)
These details help document how the submission entered the system and support traceability. They do not validate the truth of the allegations.
What this report does and does not tell you about Jeffrey Epstein
What it tells you
- A tip was received and logged under an Epstein-labeled case ID on August 3, 2020.
- The complainant explicitly alleges child sex trafficking involving Jeffrey Epstein.
- The complainant provides a claimed timeframe (mid-1984) and setting (boats/yachts connected to Lake Michigan and originating from Mona Lake, Michigan).
- The tip includes references to “other high profile individuals” and contains extreme additional allegations.
- The intake preserves those allegations in both narrative form and structured fields.
What it does not tell you
- It does not confirm the allegations.
- It does not show what investigators verified, disproved, or pursued.
- It does not provide a documented investigative conclusion.
- It is not a judicial finding, sworn testimony, or a charging instrument.
Bottom line
EFTA00025010 is best understood as a publicly released FBI intake record tied to an Epstein-labeled case file. Its value is documentary: it captures what a complainant reported, including alleged involvement of Jeffrey Epstein, an alleged timeframe and location, and additional named entities and claims. Its limitation is just as important: it is an intake log of an unverified tip, not proof of what happened.
